All I have to do is mention certain topics and suddenly, we're no longer talking. We're preparing for battle. You can almost hear the rhetorical swords being drawn, the ideological armor being fastened. Immigration. Healthcare. Education. Family values. Nationalism. Guns. The Economy. I digress.
Each phrase carries a whole ecosystem of assumptions and allegiances that immediately reveal which tribe we belong to.
But here's what breaks my heart: these conversations rarely summon stories. Faces. Names. People.
We live in a world that rewards pat answers and punishes nuance. We want quick solutions, bold stances, and airtight arguments. The more confident, the more quotable. We've created a culture where your choice of language immediately betrays your allegiances, where certain phrases function like secret handshakes that either welcome you in or lock you out.
And in this rush to be right, to be clear, to be on the correct side of history, we've lost something precious: the art of holy curiosity.
The Death of Charitable Discourse
Something is not right when we've forgotten how to disagree well.
I watch it happen everywhere. Social media feeds that function as echo chambers. Dinner conversations that explode into ideological warfare. Church meetings where people storm out because someone used the wrong vocabulary. We've become a people who listen only long enough to identify the enemy, who speak only to score points, who engage only to win.
Charitable discourse is dying. And at the heart of charitable discourse, at the very center of good and holy conversation, is holy curiosity.
Do you know the person behind the _______ issue? Not the talking points. The human being.
Do you know their name? Do you know the story of the single parent working three jobs? Or the teenager struggling with questions about faith and identity? Have you heard their prayers? Their fears? Their dreams?
When we reduce people to abstract debates, we cut ourselves off from the Spirit's work.
We miss the stories.
We miss the humanity.
We miss Jesus in the disguise of the stranger.
What if our theology began with faces instead of positions?
The Biblical Foundation for Wonder
Holy curiosity isn't a nice idea. It's a biblical imperative woven throughout Scripture.
Look at Jesus. He asked over 300 questions in the Gospels. He could have given lectures, delivered sermons, handed down pronouncements. Instead, he asked, "What do you want me to do for you?" even when the need seemed obvious. He asked, "Who do you say I am?" even though he could have simply declared it. Over and over, Jesus chose curiosity over pat answers.
The Son of God, who had every right to pontificate, chose instead to ask questions.
Consider how Scripture calls us to approach one another. "Be quick to listen, slow to speak, slow to become angry" (James 1:19). "In humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others" (Philippians 2:3-4). "To answer before listening is folly and shame" (Proverbs 18:13).
This isn't just good communication advice. It's a theological posture. It's recognition that every person bears the image of God, that every story matters, that every question deserves more than a soundbite response.
Humility: The Heart of Holy Curiosity
At its core, holy curiosity is an expression of humility. It's the willingness to admit that we don't have all the answers, that our perspective might be limited, that someone else's experience might teach us something we desperately need to learn.
Humility asks: What if I'm wrong? What if there's more to this story? What if this person's experience reveals something about God that I've never considered?
This kind of humility is terrifying in our current cultural moment.
It feels like weakness.
It looks like wavering.
It sounds like compromise.
But biblical humility isn't the absence of conviction. It's the presence of love. It's strong enough to hold our beliefs with open hands, secure enough to let our understanding be enlarged, confident enough in God's truth to believe it can withstand our questions.
When Curiosity Becomes Courage
Holy curiosity requires tremendous courage because it asks us to risk being changed by what we discover.
It means approaching the single mother at your church and asking about her story instead of making assumptions about her choices. It means sitting with the veteran who struggles with faith and wondering what he's seen that you haven't. It means listening to the teenager who's questioning their sexuality without immediately reaching for your arsenal of Bible verses.
It means recognizing that every person you encounter is carrying a story you know nothing about, wrestling with questions you've never had to face, bearing wounds you can't see.
This kind of curiosity is dangerous work. Because when you start really listening to people, when you start asking questions instead of offering answers, when you start approaching others with genuine wonder, you might discover that your neat categories don't hold. Your assumptions might crumble. Your certainty might give way to something messier but more true.
From Buzzwords to Beloved Community
Imagine what could happen if we replaced our quick judgments with personal stories.
Instead of debating abstract policies, what if we shared meals with people whose lives are affected by those decisions? Instead of arguing about values, what if we listened to the stories of people whose experiences don't fit our assumptions? Instead of defending positions, what if we asked what love actually looks like for the people right in front of us?
This isn't about abandoning our convictions or embracing relativism. It's about grounding our convictions in love instead of fear, in relationship instead of ideology, in the messy, beautiful work of actually knowing the people we're talking about.
The early church understood this. They didn't just theorize about loving their neighbors. They invited them to dinner. They shared resources. They asked questions. They built beloved community across every line that their culture insisted should divide them.
Could Holy Curiosity Change the World?
I believe it could. Not through viral moments or political victories, but through the slow, sacred work of one conversation at a time.
Holy curiosity changes the world by changing us. It softens our hearts. It expands our imagination. It reminds us that we serve a God who is both utterly trustworthy and endlessly mysterious, who calls us to faith that is both confident and humble.
It changes the world by creating space for the Spirit to move in ways we never anticipated. Because when we approach each other with genuine wonder, when we lead with questions instead of answers, when we choose relationship over being right, we become conduits for the kind of transformation that only God can orchestrate.
It changes the world by modeling a different way of being human together. In a culture that rewards quick takes and punishes nuance, we become people who linger in mystery. In a world that demands immediate answers, we become comfortable with questions. In a society that divides us into tribes, we become bridge-builders.
The Bride of Christ needs members who can engage difference without demonizing it, who can disagree without dehumanizing, who can love across the very lines that our culture insists should divide us.
This is our calling. This is our witness. This is the lost art of holy curiosity: the radical act of approaching each person as a beloved mystery rather than a problem to solve.
It won't go viral.
It won't win debates.
It won't build platforms.
But it might just heal the world.
One question, one conversation, one moment of genuine wonder at a time.
Because that's how the Kingdom comes. Not through conquest, but through curiosity. Not through certainty, but through love. Not through having all the answers, but through being brave enough to ask better questions.
And maybe, in learning to be curious about each other, we'll rediscover what it means to be truly human together.
We should have enough curiosity to be open to being wrong.
Yes, we definitely need more stories. The challenge I have personally found is two-fold. Many people I know personally are uncomfortable sharing their stories, often for good reason. Second, when I share stories that challenge a person's worldview, it is easy for them to dismiss it as a one-off example, while using similar so-called one-off stories to defend their own arguments.
I sadly don't have any easy answers, but I strongly agree that we need to make a lot more space for stories to be shared honestly and safely.